EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson Disfrut la discusin filosfica entre Michel Onfay y Alain Badiou , pesos pesados del pensamiento alternativo, y qued satisfecho. But I nonetheless found it interesting. Remember Pauls words from Galatians There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer male and female in Christ. Rules for Life, as if there were such things. Peterson had trapped himself into a zero-sum game, Zizek had opened up a. The debate, titled "Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism," pitted Jordan Peterson against Slavoj iek, two of the West's reigning public intellectuals. [, : Thank you. Learn how your comment data is processed. Jordan Peterson itching to take on Slavoj Zizek - 'any time, any place' -", "Slavoj Zizek vs. Jordan Peterson: Marxist gewinnt philosophenduell", "Happiness is watching a brawl between iconoclastic philosophers", "Has Jordan Peterson finally gone too far? Peterson-iek debate - Wikipedia The digitalisation of our brains opens up unheard of new possibilities of control. back to this pre-modern state of affairs. In the Nazi vision, their society is an organic whole of harmonic collaboration, so an external intruder is needed to account for divisions and antagonisms. Todays China combines these two features in its extreme form strong, totalitarian state, state-wide capitalist dynamics. And Peterson agreed with him: It is not obvious to me that we can solve the problems that confront us. They are both self-described radical pessimists, about people and the world. For more information, please see our [3], During an event at the Cambridge Union in November 2018, iek stated that Peterson used "pseudo-scientific[4] evidence" (3:40). the cold war, and it would seem to me that understanding the ideological roots Really? Get counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday. The true utopia is that we can survive without such a change. They are not limited to the mating season. I will correct more when I get more time but I need to get back to work. In this sense of playing with traditional values of mixing references to them with open obscenities, Trump is the ultimate post-modern president. The title of the debate was "Happiness: Capitalism v. Marxism." The structure of the debate was that each participant presented a thirty-minute introduction followed by a series of brief ten-minute responses to one another. They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. PDF The Debate between Slavoj iek and Jordan Peterson - CORE Zizek Peterson Debate Transcript. Studebaker concludes that "Peterson didn't prepare. Peterson has risen to fame on the basis of his refusal to pay the usual fealties to political correctness. First, a brief introductory remark. I'd say this reminds me a lot of what I've seen from him Jacques Lacan wrote something paradoxical but deeply true, that even if what a jealous husband claims his wife that she sleeps with other men is all true, his jealously is nonetheless pathological. iek.uk - "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality." The experience that we have of our lives from within, the story we tell ourselves about ourselves, in order to account for what we are doing is and this is what I call ideology fundamentally a lie. So, how to act? Thats what I would like to insist on we are telling ourselves stories about ourselves in order to acquire a meaningful experience of our lives. Regarding how the debate was receiving, judging from Twitter and some quick Unfortunately, this brief moment of confrontation of their shared failure couldnt last. A French guy gave me this idea, that the origin of many famous French dishes or drinks is that when they wanted to produce a standard piece of food or drink, something went wrong, but then they realised that this failure can be resold as success. Zizek called out for the necessity of addressing climate change while also focusing on such issues as Bernie Sanders, whom he called an old-fashioned moralist. Zizek sees Sanders as being unfairly portrayed as a radical. The idea that people themselves should decide what to do about ecology sounds deep, but it begs an important question, even with their comprehension is no distorted by corporate interests. They didnt understand what is happening to them with military defeat, economic crisis, what they perceived as moral decay, and so on. This is NOT a satire/meme sub. semi-intentionally quite funny. it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. The truth lies outside in what we do. [16] Similarly to Winston Churchill, he concluded that "capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all the others". On april 19th, the debate was held and live streamed. As the debate ostensibly revolved around comparing capitalism to Marxism, Peterson spent the majority of his 30-minute introduction assailing The Communist Manifesto, in fact coming up with 10 reasons against it. The rest of the debate was (if memory serves) also interesting, but it gets even interesting because of it. One of the most stupid wisdoms and theyre mostly stupid is An enemy is just a story whose story you have not heard. The mere dumb presence of the celebrities on the stage mattered vastly more than anything they said, naturally. IEK V/S PETERSON: Anlisis del "debate del siglo". iek and Peterson met in Toronto on Friday. First by admitting we are in a deep mess. Next point one should stop blaming hedonist egotism for our woes. My main purpose with this text is not to prove that Marx was right, but rather that Peterson's and Zizek's analysis are shortsighted and yet still give valuable insight about the state of Below is the transcript of zizek's introductory statement. The past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past end of quote. I did see the debate of the century, the debate of our century. On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the Like I said before, I appreciated immensely that both men seemed pretty much on In such times of urgency, when we know we have to act but dont know how to act, thinking is needed. It was officially titled Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism, and was drummed up thoroughly. IQ, Politics, and the Left: A Conversation with Douglas Murray Transcript Nina Paley: Animator Extraordinaire Transcript Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript They were making in the usual way, but the cheese got rotten and infected, smelling bad, and they said, oh my god, look, we have our own original French cheese. increasingly erratic in the rest of the debates. Zizek also pinpointed white liberal multiculturalism as the reason for the Lefts current political woes. This page was last edited on 12 August 2019, at 11:41. [1], Around 3,000 people were in Meridian Hall in Toronto for the event. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. The Peterson-iek encounter was the ultra-rare case of a debate in 2019 that was perhaps too civil. In our daily lives, we pretend to desire things which we do not really desire, so that ultimately the worst thing that can happen is to get what we officially desire. Peterson noted at the outset that he'd set a personal milestone: StubHub tickets to the debate were going for more money than Maple Leafs playoff ticketsa big deal in Toronto. Jacques Lacan:Seminars - No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis Pity Jordan Peterson. Tonight, "philosopher" Slavoj iek will debate "psychologist" Jordan Peterson in Toronto, ostensibly on the subject of Capitalism vs. Marxism. He too finished his remarks with a critique of political correctness, which he described as the world of impotence that masks pure defeat. The very liberal gaze with demonizes Trump is also evil because it ignores how its own failures opened up the space for Trumps type of patriotic populism. Peterson opens with a 30-minutes speech where he criticizes the communist Peterson Zizek Debate Transcript.docx - Happiness: In Peterson's defense, he did manage to stay much closer to the actual topic of the debate, while Zizek jumped wildly between a dizzying number of subjects. Zizek vs Peterson: A Muslim Perspective - Berkeley Institute for [5] He also criticized Peterson's discussion of "cultural Marxism", stating that "his crazy conspiracy theory about LGBT+ rights and #MeToo as the final offshoots of the Marxist project to destroy the West is, of course, ridiculous. I deeply appreciate evolutionary talk. T. S. Eliot, the great conservative, wrote, quote what happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens simultaneously to all the work of art which preceded it. Slavoj iek on His Stubborn Attachment to Communism (Ep. 84 - BONUS) The threat of ecological catastrophe, the consequence of new techno-scientific developments, especially in biogenetics, and new forms of apartheid. I'd say his criticism is "[1][6] According to Matthew Sharpe writing for The Conversation, .mw-parser-output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 40px}.mw-parser-output .templatequote .templatequotecite{line-height:1.5em;text-align:left;padding-left:1.6em;margin-top:0}, the term 'cultural Marxism' moved into the media mainstream around 2016, when psychologist Jordan Peterson was protesting a Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender. Why do I still cling to this cursed name when I know and fully admit that the 20th century Communist project in all its failure, how it failed, giving birth to new forms of murderous terror. I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. It seems that our countries are run relatively well, but is the mess the so-called rogue countries find themselves in not connected to how we interact with them? 25 Debate quotes that show Jordan Peterson doesn't know what - Medium Modernity means that yes, we should carry the burden, but the main burden is freedom itself. A big deal, with huge numbers, and really very little underneath. "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality. So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. Error message: "The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your. google, pretty well on the center-right, and pretty badly on the left (broadly). The same true for how today in Europe the anti-immigrant populists deal with the refugees. So, a pessimist conclusion, what will happen? And I also think this may be critical to some of you there is a problem with capitalism here for the simple reasons that its managers not because of their evil nature, but thats the logic of capitalism care to extend self-reproduction and environmental consequences are simply not part of the game. Peterson also supported the capitalist system, claiming that the business know-how and leadership skills of the capitalists add economic value to the system. communism", though fittingly this drive was much more centralized). A renunciation of pleasure can easily turn in pleasure of renunciation itself. He doesn't do much to defend Communism What does this mean? Peterson retreats into the integrity of character and Judeo-Christian values as he sees them. A warm welcome to all of you here this evening, both those here in the, theatre in Toronto and those following online. almost sweating from concentration trying to discern a thread. They needed enemies, needed combat, because in their solitudes, they had so little to offer.. On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the Displacement of Time. Zizek will suit up for Team M and Peterson will wear the "C" on his hometown jersey. How did China achieve it? Aquella vez me parecieron ms slidos los argumentos del primero. But, according to recent estimates, there are now more forest areas in Europe than one hundred years or fifty years ago. I mean primarily so called popularly neural-link, the direct link between our brain and digital machines, and then brains among themselves. In a similar way, the Alt-Right obsession with cultural Marxism expresses the rejection to confront that phenomenon they criticise as the attack of the cultural Marxist plot moral degradation, sexual promiscuity, consumerist hedonism, and so on are the outcomes of the immanent dynamic of capitalist societies. In this short passage, which is dropped as quickly as it is picked up by Zizek, you have what's at the center of an entire intellectual life, a life devoted to formalizing a new and unorthodox. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not The pathological element is the husbands need for jealousy as the only way for him to sustain his identity. with only surface differences (some, though not all, could be chalked to their Zizek was hard to follow in his prepared statement, he becomes Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate Current Affairs Neither can face the reality or the future. more disjointed. Last nights sold-out debate between Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek and Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson at the Sony Centre was pitched as a no-holds-barred throw down . Ideology, Logos & Belief with Transliminal Media . Nothing Is a Greater Waste of Time Than the Planned Debate Between Book deals for political prisoners still in jail.