2022. As a civil right mover he gave this great speech to all Americans (black and white) so that he could give off the idea of equality on the same level. His main purpose was to try to persuade the audience to . Artifact One: Beyond Vietnam: A Rhetorical Analysis "The Fine Art of Baloney Detection" Essay by Carl Sagan. His speech grows deeply sarcastic at times. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King, Jr., an enormously influential civil rights activist, conveys his indignant and hopeful thoughts regarding the Vietnam War, in his speech "Beyond Vietnam," by utilizing biblical allusion, anaphora, and use of diction. This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. King calms the African Americans who are being oppressed by using the words, this situation can and will be changed. and Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. which gives them hope that there will be a new day when a change will take place. In the speech, Martin Luther King specifically indicates that America needs to end the war with Vietnam. King argues that all people are created equal and directly challenged the outdated and abhorrent views that upheld the false flag of racial superiority among White Americans. What Is the Macro Environment in Business Analysis? Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" Pharapreising and interpretation due to major educational standards released by a particular educational institution as well as tailored to your educational institution if different; More importantly, King states that, the poor has been manipulated into believing a type of reality that simply isnt accurate or fair on their part. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. requirements? This lecture became an explosive example of colorful language and visual examples that expanded the idea of rhetoric. His pleas are first to the audiences sense of logic and their immediate concerns for their own country. He evaluates the psychological as well as social, political and economic implications of America's participation in Vietnam war. The idea of nonviolence is much larger than ordinary people see. Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay.docx - Thomas 1 All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. To get his point through and make the meaning clear, King uses phrases like break the silence of the night, a vocation of agony, based upon the mandates of conscience, deeper level of awareness. War was an inhuman and barbaric exercise and America's participation was not in human interest. Apart from drawing a parallel between the situation in Vietnam and America, he shows neither stood to gain from it. The audience now feel as though this is very important because it has to do with regular poor people and t effects them as well. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best It is just a continuation of the regimes that have been trying to oppress the Vietnamese. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam. The war was only going to consume lives and resources. During this time period there was a lot of controversy surrounding the war. King demonstates this by saying, In deep disappointment, I have wept over the laxity of the church. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". (2022, May 4). However, a very powerful speech, in manys opinion, is the Ive Been to the Mountaintop speech, given shortly before Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated. An Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam Martin Luther King Jr. builds an argument to persuade his audience that American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. Apart from being an advocate of Mahatma Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, Martin Luther King Jr was a great leader and rhetor of all times. In his argument, King mounts a multi-pronged attack on America's participation in the Vietnam war and also gains people's sympathy for the Vietnamese. He efficiently uses the anecdote to tell how he has spoken with young men, telling them how violence will not solve their problems. He expresses his anguish at seeing people of Vietnam and America suffer and also notes that if American folks do not break their silence they stand to lose much more than their opponents. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. However, his words while they aim to bring the pain of the Vietnamese alive before the audience also include a request that a progressive nation should stand with humanity and not lose control of its feelings. Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence Analysis - Bartleby In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin | Cram Additionally, by constructing an optimistic view on the civil rights situation during that time period and immediately refuting it, King is able to establish a strong sense of, Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your The speaker comments, that they wander into the hospitals with at least twenty casualties from American firepower for one Vietcong-inflicted injury. Favorite Quote:What doesn't kill you only makes you stronger. Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." It is not typical for churches to do so. (2022) 'The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis'. Disclaimer: Services provided by StudyCorgi are to be used for research purposes only. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war(8). In short, this makes the audience more inclined to listen to the rest of Martin Luther king Jr's speech, as well as setting the bottom line that the Vietnam War creates devastating problems for everyone. However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. In this way, while he successfully draws a parallel between the struggles of Vietnamese people and that of the Americans, he also lays the foundation for the next stages of his argument. Rodriguez 1 Melanie Rodriguez Ms. Jimenez Composition II 20 October, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" "Never be afraid to do what's right. Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesnt address their oppressor, the U.S. government. Martin luther king jr beyond vietnam speech analysis sat. Rhetorical In front of over 3000 people at the New York Riverside Church King preaches to a room filled with clergy and laymen concerned about the Vietnam. The speech was given to a large, mixed audience of primarily civil rights activists. Is Hydrogen Fuel Efficient Enough to Replace Fossil Fuels in the Near Future. It is why he constructs an argument that will help people decide which side to stand with and which to not. He includes various perspectives and addresses several counterarguments with the intention to prove the futility of war as a tool to address social, economic and political problems. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. While his I Have a Dream speech is considered his best one, his other speeches too offer a glimpse of his powerful rhetoric and his art of persuasion. An Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam - M.J. Public opinion steadily turned against the war following 1967 and by 1970 only a third of Americans believed that the U.S. had not made a mistake by sending troops to fight in Vietnam (Wikipedia). Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. These two techniques played a crucial role in furthering his purpose and in provoking a powerful response from the audience that made this speech memorable and awe-inspiring. Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. To make his claims stand out and have a deeper impact, he uses instances from Vietnamese history to show the level of injustice faced by its people how war has destabilized them. Registration number: 419361 Read More Use Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Speech 409 Words | 2 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. was extremely passionate about nonviolence. Then the segregation of African Americans and White Americans started. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. This is an attempt to connect with the audiences emotions and prove that the war was imposed on them and even if politicians call it patriotic, society and people would never love war. But be assured that my tears have been tears of love (8). Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond | Bartleby Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break | Bartleby Apart from highlighting the wicked nature of the war, King Jr 's speech also sets the urgency for protest. However, he is about to arm them with many valid reasons why it is crucial for them to join the opposition. Titled as the I Have a Dream Speech, he read this speech to the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. It allows them to imagine what might happen if America were to keep fighting in the war. The rhythm and frequent repetition are used to drive home his key points, stressing the importances of his goal. 4 May. If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence In the speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence," by Martin Luther King Jr. he expresses his opinion on how the Vietnam war is unjust. Dr. King paints a vivid, heart-wrenching picture of the devastation in Vietnam. While his words clearly deliver his disappointment over the path American government had chosen, it also expresses a clear intention to not be with the wrong and instead listen to ones inner voice. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. Since an autopsy is only done on dead creatures, King is saying that eventually, the soul of America might die. The imagery paints a dark picture in the audiences mind. In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. Then Dr. King says that the church should oppose the war simply because it is counter to the ministry of Jesus Christ. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam". Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. Because of his crowd of mix races King made sure to make his speech imploring to all no matter what the race that they may be. He also affirms that people have better options and that the idea of war, despite that it sounds patriotic is basically inhuman. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". Dr. King says, Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their governments policy, especially in time of war (3). King makes the nation appears as hypocrites because Americans pretend to fight as a united nation whereas segregation is among the same schools, the same neighborhood, the same country. At last the paper discusses and assesses how to what an extent Kings dream came true with self-elected sources as backrest for the asses. Rhetorical Mlk Speech "Beyond Vietnam". Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. It is clear that he wants the audience of church leaders to go back to their churches and fearlessly speak out in opposition of the war. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. https://nolongerinvisiblemen.wordpress.com/2014/11/11/sparknotes-for-martin-luther-king-jr-s-a-time-to-break-silence/, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm, Microsoft Corporation SWOT Analysis (2016), Zora Neale Hurstons Their Eyes were watching God: Analysis. Dr. King's purpose is to make the church leaders he is speaking to aware that Martin Luther King Jr says in his first paragraph that,"It seemed as if there was a real promise fr hope to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destruction suction tube." In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence. In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. Dr. King genuinely believes that the war is in direct opposition to the teachings of Christ and therefore the church must speak out in a united voice against it. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence He picks from history as well as politics and also supports his choices with philosophical wisdom. Ironic elements are evident in abundance throughout Kings speech which elicit an comical tone and draws on the reality of the war. All rights reserved. These emotionally charged images would seemingly convince anyone that the cause for this war could not possibly be just. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. He specifically mentions a poverty program that was looking promising before the United States became involved in Vietnam. We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! Dont In a sense, he dives right into the idea that it is unrealistic for them to find freedom in a region halfway across the world when they couldnt even find it in America. His passionate tone flowed through these strategies, increasing their persuasive power on the people and encouraging them to follow/listen to his message on racial injustice. Dr. King plainly states his purpose near the beginning of his speech. King, Martin Luther Jr. Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence. Church Meeting, 1967, Riverside Church, New York City. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. 350 5th Ave, New York, NY 10118, USA. He repeatedly stresses upon breaking the silence because in this situation being silent was a sin. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King delivered his first major public statement against the Vietnam War, entitled "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence." Addressing a crowd of 3,000 at Riverside Church in New York City, King condemned the war as anti-democratic, impractical, and unjust. Along with, and the almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam, First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country. Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his opinion on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. King builds an effective argument by using imagery, noting the irony associated with the war, and pointing out the contrast between America before the war and America then. Just like the people of America, the Vietnamese also have a right to live free on the lands of their fathers. To achieve this, he used rhetorical strategies such as appeal to pathos and repetition. They now also understand that the Vietnam War plays a bigger role in America than just the men gone to war, it affects others too, like them. King proved this partly with the quote, America would never invest the necessary funds in the rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued (King, Beyond, 9). The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Martin Luther King Jr proves to all throughout his speech Beyond Vietnam --- A Time to Break Silence that the Vietnam war was unjust by his use of emotional diction, the allusion of Jim crow, and repetition. If he had not shown knowledge of the background of the war, it would be easy to dismiss his other pleas as lofty religious ideals. It also describes the Jim Crow laws and the busboy cot from 1955. As he notes towards the end of his speech, "If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood ". Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). Kings main motive was to persuade people to see how war was destroying lives, society and economy and being silent meant being in approval of the war. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. (King). He does this by appealing to certain issues the public see as important, using irony, and using diction and tone in persuasive ways. His choice of diction and use of imagery help him deliver his point effectively in a manner that impresses both the audience's heart and mind. Later in his speech, King writes again using an advanced vocabulary to reinforce his academic background with, America would never be free or saved from itself until the descendants of its slaves were loosed completely from the shackles they still wear. By using the word shackles, the reader can easily create a vivid image in their mind of how restricted the poor must feel, and whether it be physically or mentally, they can understand how much the restrained are longing for a sense of freedom. 1. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . He does it to engage peoples imagination and to awaken their consciences. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/, StudyCorgi. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam Furthermore his speech did not. This quote causes the audience to realize the contradiction in the Vietnam war policy, making them less likely to accept. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. This special lyrical and parallel structure helped get his main points across and allows a large audience to understand simple but powerful words (Layfield) . Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. Right at the outset, King involves religious figures to establish the credibility for his reason and to prove that war was improper and inhuman. Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. King uses quotes as these to suggest to convince them of the destruction of the Vietnam War, with pathos, by strongly appealing to his audience's emotion. us: [emailprotected]. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. Dr. King's purpose is . Over the past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many persons have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. War makes the innocent lose hope and leaves behind horrific memories for generations on both sides. For example, he writes vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will, drown your sisters and brothers and hated filled policemen even kill your brothers and sisters (3). For example, in paragraph 7, King discusses the harsh reality of the war. And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. He calls the situation some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. To this day, Kings speech remains one of the most famous and influential speeches in, Martin Luther King was a determined activist for equality for all. In this way, he tries to stress that even if we have progressed, we have grown nowhere better than the ancient barbarians that killed for fun. The audience felt empowered by the sentence alone. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence By Martin Luther King "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. Showing his knowledge of the history of the war and using it to discredit the United States reason for being there is crucial to Dr. King in developing his position. In Martin Luther King Jr.s speech Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. Martin Luther King Jr. Src: Pixabay Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. To help his audience see that Vietnam is only madness, a wastage of resources and an ignorance of more pressing concerns, King once again affirms that war was never a means of peace. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. StudyCorgi, 4 May 2022, studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and.